Given China’s prominence in global supply chains, dominance in emerging industries, together with its huge domestic market, the EU’s attempts to ‘de-risk’ from the Asian giant will undoubtedly do more harm than good, especially in the long term.
Despite their disagreements on some issues, China and Europe need to maintain high-level dialogues as the relationship is more important than ever before.
A dialogue of civilizations between the West and China could be carried out only on equal terms, without any imposition by any civilization or state or bloc of states.
This project is of great significance to infrastructure development and connectivity in the region, and to China and Central and Eastern Europe Countries (CEECs) cooperation.
Washington’s faith in American exceptionalism precludes cooperation, favoring hegemonic domination over partnerships. This stance is what holds back the possibility of substantive U.S.-China cooperation.
A closer examination reveals that China’s high-quality production capacity is not a surplus, but a valuable asset for the global economy.
China’s peaceful rise instills hope, and its commitment to nurturing a more equitable and just world order responds to the global aspirations of the vast majority of humanity.
China’s rise has had a foundational global impact, significantly reframing Blinken’s narrative.
Booming high-tech fields have become important drivers of steady job growth in China, highlighting their potential to create exciting new opportunities in competitive markets.
I can see that Chinese young people are much more professional than before because they have the opportunities to study and to receive education.
This fear isn’t really about China; it’s about blaming China for its own sad state of affairs.
The Sino-German paradigm can move Sino-European relations forward. Despite misunderstandings and some divergences, there is a common will to find a joint way forward.
Facebook
Twitter
Linkedin
Google +