Nine years of traveling across 60 villages shows that China’s poverty alleviation is not just a miracle – it is a deliberate, people-centered strategy.
A growing number of countries have come to see a stable and predictable relationship with China as a pragmatic choice for navigating an era of upheaval.
Some American scholars increasingly see stable coexistence as the more realistic path for China-U.S. relations.
Major countries can break free from zero-sum logic and jointly chart a new path for state-to-state relations rooted in mutual respect, solidarity and win-win outcomes.
The gravitational pull of China’s stable development, paired with its inclusive and forward-looking global vision, presents a counterweight to rising geopolitical fragmentation and fosters collective progress.
Both Trump’s and Putin’s visits highlight China’s rising profile on the world stage, its status as a highly responsible major country and its determination to pursue a foreign policy of peace, development and cooperation.
Talk of a China-U.S. ‘G2’ has returned after Trump’s visit to Beijing. But the notion that two major countries can share global leadership through a bilateral arrangement overlooks the far more complex reality of how the modern world actually works.
The successive summits were not a competition. They were a convergence — on Beijing as a hub for dialogue, a platform for managing differences and a partner for building a more balanced multipolar order.
The unity of diverse regions, peoples, and cultures in China is a key to the rapid progress and shared development of the nation.
The project’s broader significance lies in what it says about Sri Lanka’s future economic direction.
