BRICS at 20: A Rising Voice for the Global South
BRICS cooperation has moved beyond the outdated logic of political and military blocs, embracing a partnership based on mutual trust and mutual benefit.
BRICS cooperation has moved beyond the outdated logic of political and military blocs, embracing a partnership based on mutual trust and mutual benefit.
Over five years, the Global Development Initiative (GDI) has grown from a Chinese proposal into a multilateral effort backed by more than 130 countries and international organizations, restoring development to the center of global governance.
The fair has already shown what it can produce: companies with specialized, hard-to-market services landing buyers in countries they’d never reached before.
Kyrgyzstan-China relations have passed through three distinct stages—border stabilization, institutionalization and infrastructure integration—and are now entering a fourth: economic connectivity on a transcontinental scale.
The visit consequently points towards a China-Africa relationship increasingly shaped by the interaction of trade, production, technology, finance and security.
Indeed, the ‘real China’ is far more compelling than the ‘reported China.’
The Long March remains globally relevant not only as a historic turning point for the CPC, but also as a lasting symbol of resilience, strategic vision, unity, and people-centered governance.
There is a difference between holding power accountable with verifiable facts and converting tragedy into a referendum on a country one has already decided to condemn.
For most of the world, cooperation is far preferable to conflict, and interdependence is far preferable to the law of the jungle.
At the strategic level, both countries need each other, and no long-term plans can be built without leveraging the deep-rooted relationship between them for the benefit of both peoples.
China and Africa are forging new pathways for artificial intelligence, connecting technology with local needs, development and global cooperation.
There’s a movement toward more university autonomy, with the government giving universities more freedom in academic and financial matters, in tandem with new models of assessment that emphasize long-term impacts over short-term results.