The Reason for China’s Rage
Japan’s hope for U.S. intervention appears to be a path that leads nowhere.
Japan’s hope for U.S. intervention appears to be a path that leads nowhere.
Japan joins U.S.-driven strategy for China containment.
Policymakers now face the difficult task of balancing this evolving sentiment—working with China on shared global challenges such as climate change and public health, while safeguarding U.S. interests and maintaining leverage.
The future of the Asia-Pacific, and indeed the stability of the global economy, depends on their ability to coexist constructively in an interconnected world.
In an era of globalization, no country can solve all problems on its own. On this point, the U.S. Government must come to a clearer understanding.
The two countries can help lift bilateral trade from its current lows to new heights, benefiting not only both nations but also the global economy as a whole.
The U.S. soybean dilemma highlights a harsh truth in global trade: Unilateralism and tariff wars are counterproductive. By continuing to favor coercion over cooperation, the United States may find itself increasingly alone in the global marketplace.
Until Washington stops confusing nationalism with strategy, it will keep losing ground not to China, but to itself.
At this critical moment, what we need is not more port fees and countermeasures, but more rationality—and restraint.
The essence of China-U.S. economic and trade relations is mutual benefit and win-win cooperation, underpinned by broad opportunities and shared interests.
True global governance is not governance by the U.S. or the West, but by all countries, especially the Global South, which accounts for 80 percent of the world’s population, acting collectively to address global challenges.