Why NATO’s Decision to Label China a ‘Systemic Challenge’ Is Absurd
China does not present a threat or challenge to NATO; it does not see itself as a competitor and does not seek to build any kind of alliance bloc.
China does not present a threat or challenge to NATO; it does not see itself as a competitor and does not seek to build any kind of alliance bloc.
The impact of the Roe v. Wade has been far beyond abortion to promote social change in many areas, including sexual orientation, occupation, social class, gender, race, disability, and other dimensions of discrimination.
Before triggering a major war in the Pacific, Washington must drop its Cold War mentality and delusions.
The 14th BRICS Summit is of great importance in jointly upholding international fairness and justice, revitalizing global development, and promoting the building of a community with a shared future for mankind.
Since the end of the Cold War in 1991, each subsequent U.S. administration has emphasized that it is ‘on the right side of history,’ despite their expansionist attempts with catastrophic results, such as in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Libya. From these instances, it is obvious who the real expansionist is.
Tragically, the fate of Ukraine does not seem to lie in its own hands, or those of Europe as a whole. To continue the war or to seek peace eventually is a decision left up to Russia and the United States.
The denial of this fundamental freedom could lead to any number of grave and life-altering consequences for a woman without rights.
China and the EU share a great responsibility to uphold the global free trade system and other forms of multilateral cooperation, especially on achieving sustainable development and meeting the Paris agreement targets.
The current impasse over BRICS expansion is the perfect occasion to discuss the effective institutionalization of the group. In other words, make BRICS an international organization.
It had to be an extremely limited bill to win the backing of 15 Republican senators, who usually oppose all gun bills.
The commitment to not influencing the internal affairs of other nations and to not advancing trade agreements that come with certain strings attached offers an intriguing counterbalance to the G7.
Considering their own historical mistakes, perhaps it’s time for countries like the U.S., Canada, Australia and New Zealand to change their tune and tone down the rhetoric.